Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Chris Daly's remarkable house-buying luck



Well, well, well.

I've long thought it odd that Chris Daly's fan club seemed to be distinctly unlike him. After all, most of them are staunchly against the rich and powerful, and certainly wouldn't support anyone who exploits them for his own gain. But Daly actually isn't very much like his base. He's a Southern Ivy League alumnus who owns a nice new home here in San Francisco, and gets paid about $118,000 per year -- many times what most of his constituents earn. The deeper I dig into Daly's finances, the odder things become.

In 2001, Daly and his then-fiancée Sarah purchased a new condo on Stevenson Street in the Upper Mission, just off Valencia St. The 1,360 square-foot home has three bedrooms, a full bath and two half-baths; quite spacious by SF standards, and the largest available in the 101 Valencia St. development. The condo was priced at $435,000 -- a daunting amount to most young couples, but Daly had an ace up his sleeve. The condo they were looking at was specifically designated "BMR" -- "below market rate" -- a term which means that, by law, it could only be sold only to an individual earning less than $76,600 per year for one person, or $87,500 for a couple. BMRs are specifically intended to enable low-income people to own their own home.

At that time, a Supervisor's salary was $40,000 a year, plus the additional income that Daly was paid in stipends for sitting on certain boards and commissions. His fiancée's income was $32,000 a year, which meant that they just barely made it below the threshold to qualify for the BMR property. Like most young people (and like the vast majority of his constituents), Daly and his fiancée didn't have $135,000 for the down-payment lying around. Fortunately for Daly, his mom loaned him $95,000 at below-market interest rates, and he sold $40,000 of his mutual funds for most of the rest. Must be nice to have such resources to draw from.

But here's where it starts to get curiouser and curiouser. A few months after Daly closed the deal on his new BMR condo, Daly and his cohorts on the Board of Supervisors introduced a measure known as Proposition J. It called for their own salaries -- $40,000 a year for the part-time positions -- to skyrocket to $118,000 a year. Significantly (but buried in the small print), Prop. J took the power for setting the Supervisors' salaries out of the hands of the public for all time, instead putting future raises in the hands of the Civil Service Commission -- roughly the equivalent of asking the bank robbers to mind the bank. Equally significantly, Prop. J did not prohibit Supervisors from continuing to receive income from other work (most Supervisors have long had other sources of income); many other counties ban such supplemental income. And at the same time that the Board of Supervisors were engineering a 300% pay raise for themselves, San Francisco was going through a recession in which we lost about 100,000 jobs.

The Supervisors placed the measure on the ballot, adding a lot of rhetoric about how the 300% pay raise was merely keeping up with what Supervisors were paid in some other cities (although the Statewide average for a county supervisor was actually $52,000 a year -- near the median income of San Franciscans). The public swallowed the story, and -- boom! -- just like that, Supervisor Daly and his fiancee were now making $150,000 a year, squarely disqualifying them for BMR housing. The more naive reader might think "my, how lucky that Daly managed to qualify for his 'low income' 3-bedroom condo just before that unexpected windfall!", whereas the more cynical might think "my, how clever that Daly managed to qualify for his 'low income' 3-bedroom condo just before he knew he would no longer qualify for it!"

As it stands now, Chris Daly and his wife co-own their condo with World Savings Bank until they pay off the mortgage. Presuming that their mortgage is for 25 years, that means that the Daly's will have spent just a few months of their time as mortgage-paying homeowners while actually qualified to purchase their condo in the first place. And given the certainty that the proposition which yielded such a great pay raise for the Supervisors was being discussed and strategized between the Supervisors during the months before it was formally introduced, it's extremely likely that Chris Daly knew that he'd be getting a monster of a pay raise very soon after he was trying to qualify as "low income". Kind of makes you wonder -- when Daly says that he's the champion of "affordable housing for San Franciscans" -- if he's just referring to himself.

7 Comments:

Blogger Mindful Life said...

yeah - one of the difficulties I had in buying a home (I wanted desperately to qualify for a BMR condo) was that I didn't have any money for a down payment. I could barely cover closing costs. I certainly didn't have $40k of mutual funds to sell off nor were my parents in a position to "loan" me $95k.

So I sit here, 1 year into a 5 year ARM, hoping to god I will have a higher paying job or be able to refinance again when it's time to adjust up since I can barely afford my payments now.

But you know, I don't count to Chris. I'm a rich property owner. Just like him apparently - but with less than half the salary, a condo 1/3 the size of his (480 square feet of love, baby) and without the rich parents.

I'd like to think about having a baby someday - but would I do it in a 480 square foot studio? Does that sound responsible? Not really. Hey, maybe I can have the baby, remain unmarried, go on AFDC and then get all kinds of public assistance because I am a single mom. I'd get a bigger place, probably...hmmm...

12:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like I've said before, Chris Daly is no idiot. It's the people who elected him that should have their heads examined.

Point of clarification: Duke is not an Ivy League school, but is no less an elitist institution than Stanford, MIT, Amherst, etc. And the next time you run into Chris, ask him to show you his Duke diploma... Wait a second! I don't think he has one of those. I guess finishing something he started (college) took a back seat to pulling the wool over the poor saps of D6.

12:57 PM  
Blogger the clicker said...

"Point of clarification: Duke is not an Ivy League school..."

Right, but it is commonly referred to as a "Southern Ivy League" school, along with Vanderbilt, Rice and Emory. And, according to the 2006 U.S. News and World Report rankings, Duke actually scores higher than 4 of the "real" Ivy League universities.

And yeah -- Daly dropped out of school. It's too bad; he might've actually learned something about economics had he stayed.

1:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

uh...i think everyone on the board of supes makes 118 k. what's your point? that every supervisor is out of touch with the city? nice try. unfortunately, the fact is that almost all politicians come from at leat upper-middle class families.

his main challenger for the district 6 seat has worked as a lawyer for rebublicans. i'd say that's about as out of touch with sf as you can get.

8:07 PM  
Blogger the clicker said...

What's my point? I'm sorry you missed it. Here you go:

2000 -- Chris Daly seeks an office which has a salary of $40,000 a year, damned good for a college dropout. He wins the office -- again, knowing that he's getting paid $40,000 a year.

2001 -- Daly and his wife find a BMR, 3-bedroom condo for $435,000 -- a price extremely low for SF, but extremely high for Daly's income. It is ONLY available to couples earning less than $79,000 a year. Daly and his then-fiancee earn just under the legal threshold.

2002 -- Daly and the BoS introduce Proposition J, which will raise their salary to $118,000 a year. When the proposition passes, Daly is now ineligible for BMR housing.

2006 -- the condo is now worth about $700,000.

Given the highly suspicious timing involved, I would say that -- at the very least -- Daly showed bad judgment for giving the appearance of a conflict of interest and, at the worst, he believed that the proposition he had a hand in drafting would pass, thus making a killing in a real estate investment that he knew he wouldn't long be qualified for.

I think it's rather unseemly for a supposed champion of the poor to be living the life of luxury that Daly leads. How many of his constituents can afford to buy a new, 3-bedroom condo? At least Rob Black is just a renter.


As for your attempt to smear Rob Black for the law firm at which he worked:

Law firms represent whatever clients hire them, Democrat or Republican, innocent saint or mass-murderer. That's what they do. The firm Black worked for represented the AFL-CIO, among other Democratic groups. And Hillary Rodham Clinton worked for a "Republican law firm" for many years; that doesn't make her a Republican.

Any recent graduate of law school is thrilled to be offered a job working at one of the most prestigious law firms in California. Black was an "associate" at N-M, the lowest rung of the ladder for anyone who has passed the Bar. Should we look into your background and see if you've ever worked for any employer who might've had dealings with Republicans?

Black's party allegiance can hardly be questioned, considered he worked for Clinton-Gore in 1996, and then for Jimmy Carter.

You're grasping at straws.

11:51 PM  
Anonymous Rich said...

actually, law firms can choose their clients. They don't work for whoever hires them. They review the legal matters to be handled and then proceed, and most assuredly take into consideration the wealth, political leanings, and other related aspects of the potential client. A mass-murdered may have the means to hire a prestigious law firm, but the firm is in no way required to represent that person. So in that aspect, you are entirely off base.

10:28 AM  
Anonymous Mr. Tender-Nob said...

Rich: Law firms do not "choose their clients". Other than ambulance chasers and firms that hope to be on retainer, law firms don't go after clients, they respond to clients who approach them. They decide whether or not to accept prospective clients. There's a substantive difference.

Regardless, Rob Black had zero input into either choosing or accepting clients. If you read my original post, that distinction should be clear.

11:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home